As reported by nj.com, a consultant’s report on the advantages of sharing Bordentown Township and Bordentown City police services was met with skepticism from the public, though officials urged people to give the idea serious consideration. Despite being separate municipalities, the two Bordentowns could and should have a shared police force, according to the presentation, which consisted of findings from a 2 ½ year study conducted by Patriot Consulting Group, a Longbranch-based local government operations consulting firm.

Patriot concluded that the move would not produce savings for the municipalities, but would increase police services at no extra expense for taxpayers. Patriot’s president, Brian Valentino, said shared police services was already happening across the two municipalities and his plan would simply formalize the procedures for those situations. His group also recommended that the move be a step toward an eventual consolidation of the two police forces. 

Once the police departments are fully unified, services would increase through the creation of a new division dedicated to community activities, such as youth clubs, according to Valentino’s recommendations. The report also calls for the creation of individual traffic, patrolling and criminal investigation bureaus that would allow officers to specialize in those areas, rather than generally work in all three, Valentino said. Still, the idea seemed unpopular with many residents at a public meeting, who also seemed to believe the move could not be accomplished without costing taxpayers more.

Sharing services is becoming more commonplace in New Jersey as costs rise and governing officials seeks alternatives to raising taxes. Many, including some state officials, are advocating full consolidation of services and even municipalities. However, the loss of local control, other political ramifications and the costs to wealthier towns of merging with less affluent districts have been insurmountable obstacles in many cases.

In Hightstown, a four-year discussion to consolidate police forces with neighbor East Windsor fell apart recently, when Hightstown Borough Council members made a decision to instead renew their town’s police contracts for another five years. Princeton Township and Borough are weighing something more ambitious, a total consolidation of the two municipalities. Late last month a panel of representatives from both towns recommended that the towns’ governing bodies consider holding a referendum on the issue.

As for the Bordentowns, the plan will remain in the discussion phase for some time before the municipalities decide to take any actions, according to Bordentown Township Mayor Michael Dauber.

Print:
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn
Photo of Donald C. Barbati Donald C. Barbati

Donald C. Barbati is a shareholder of Crivelli, Barbati & DeRose, L.L.C. His primary practice revolves around the representation of numerous public employee labor unions in various capacities to include contract negotiation, unfair labor practice litigation, contract grievance arbitration, and other diverse issues…

Donald C. Barbati is a shareholder of Crivelli, Barbati & DeRose, L.L.C. His primary practice revolves around the representation of numerous public employee labor unions in various capacities to include contract negotiation, unfair labor practice litigation, contract grievance arbitration, and other diverse issues litigated before the courts and administrative tribunals throughout the State of New Jersey. In addition, Mr. Barbati also routinely represents individuals in various types of public pension appeals, real estate transactions, and general litigation matters. He is a frequent contributor to the New Jersey Public Safety Officers Law Blog, a free legal publication designed to keep New Jersey public safety officers up-to-date and informed about legal issues pertinent to their profession. During his years of practice, Mr. Barbati has established a reputation for achieving favorable results for his clients in a cost-efficient manner.

Mr. Barbati has also handled numerous novel legal issues while representing New Jersey Public Safety Officers. Most notably, he served as lead counsel for the Appellants in the published case In re Rodriguez, 423 N.J. Super. 440 (App. Div. 2011). In that case, Mr. Barbati successfully argued on behalf of the Appellants, thereby overturning the Attorney General’s denial of counsel to two prison guards in a civil rights suit arising from an inmate assault. In the process, the Court clarified the standard to be utilized by the Attorney General in assessing whether a public employee is entitled to legal representation and mandated that reliance must be placed on up-to-date information.

Prior to becoming a practicing attorney, Mr. Barbati served as a judicial law clerk to the Honorable Linda R. Feinberg, Assignment Judge of the Superior Court of New Jersey, Mercer Vicinage. During his clerkship Mr. Barbati handled numerous complex and novel substantive and procedural issues arising from complaints in lieu of prerogative writs, orders to show cause, and motion practice. These include appeals from decisions by planning and zoning boards and local government bodies, bidding challenges under the Local Public Contract Law, Open Public Records Act requests, the taking of private property under the eminent domain statute, and election law disputes. In addition, Mr. Barbati, as a certified mediator, mediated many small claims disputes in the Special Civil Part.

Mr. Barbati received a Bachelor of Arts degree in history, magna cum laude, from Rider University in Lawrenceville, New Jersey. Upon graduating, Mr. Barbati attended Widener University School of Law in Wilmington, Delaware. In 2007, he received his juris doctorate, magna cum laude, graduating in the top five percent of his class. During law school, Mr. Barbati interned for the Honorable Joseph E. Irenas, Senior United States District Court Judge for the District of New Jersey in Camden, New Jersey, assisting on various constitutional, employment, and Third Circuit Court of Appeals litigation, including numerous civil rights, social security, and immigration cases.